The inspiration of Scripture is the supernatural operation of the Holy Spirit who, through the different personalities and literary styles of the chosen human authors, invested the very words of the original books of Holy Scripture, alone and in their entirety, as the very Word of God without error in all that they teach (including history and science) and is thereby the infallible rule and final authority for the faith and practice of all believers.–Dr. Norman Geisler, Systematic Theology, Volume I
Note: When Dr. Geisler says the Bible is without error in regard to history and science, he is not suggesting that we use the Bible as a history or science book per say, but rather that what the Bible mentions in regard to these subjects is without error.
The Bible in our hands is the infallible and inerrant Word of God insofar as it has been copied accurately. And it has been copied so accurately as to assure us that nothing in the essential message has been lost.–Dr. Norman Geisler, Systematic Theology, Volume I
So long as your mind entertains any misgivings as to the certainty of the word of God, its authority will be weak and dubious, or rather will have no authority at all. [Further,] nor is it sufficient to believe that God is true, and cannot lie or deceive, unless you feel firmly persuaded that every word which proceeds from him is sacred, inviolable truth.–John Calvin in Geisler
Common Errors Of Those Seeking Errors In The Bible:–Dr. Norman Geisler, Systematic Theology, Volume I
- Assuming That the Unexplained Is Not Explainable
- Presuming the Bible Guilty Until Proven Innocent
- Confusing Our Fallible Interpretations With God’s Infallible Revelation
- Failing to Understand the Context of the Passage
- Neglecting to Interpret Difficult Passages in the Light of Clear Ones
- Basing a Teaching on an Obscure Passage
- Forgetting That the Bible Is a Human Book With Human Characteristics
- Assuming That a Partial Report Is a False Report
- Demanding That New Testament Citations of the Old Testament Always Be Exact Quotations
- Assuming That Divergent Accounts Are False Ones
- Presuming That the Bible Approves of All It Records
- Forgetting That the Bible Uses Non-Technical, Everyday Language
- Assuming That Round Numbers Are False
- Neglecting to Note That the Bible Uses Different Literary Devices
- Forgetting That Only the Original Text, Not Every Copy of Scripture, Is Without Error
- Confusing General Statements With Universal Ones
- Forgetting That Later Revelation Supersedes Previous Revelation
- The Allegation That Grammatical Irregularities Are Errors
If we are perplexed by any apparent contradiction in Scripture, it is not allowable to say, “The author of this book is mistaken”; but either the manuscript is faulty, or the translation is wrong, or you have not understood.–Augustine in Geisler

I know some respected bible scholars will use #9 to throw out entire translations they don’t like because they won’t render the Greek citations exactly the same as the Hebrew ones in English.
Aaron, when are we going to hear more of your sermons?
Comment by — October 30, 2006 @ 12:50 pm
In the 21st century we accept paraphrased quotations, I’m at a loss as to why scholars would expect any less in the 1st century.
If anyone ever asks me to preach again, and I am able to get it recorded I will certainly make it available on High Caliber Guns. Unfortunately, it seems that I am not, shall we say, “on fire” right now!
Thanks,
Aaron Jackson
Comment by — October 30, 2006 @ 1:52 pm