January 29, 2007

A Smoking Christian?…

One of the theological tenets of most conservative (non Reformed) Christians that I am unable to swallow is the total abolition of alcohol and tobacco consumption. It is of the latter that this post is dedicated.Certainly this has been a long journey for me. Having grown up in a house where alcohol was considered evil in and of itself (in practice if not in principle), it has been a long road for my views to change so dramatically. Still, with a little hermeneutics, a little history, and a willingness to admit error (if error exists), I have changed my views. I won’t go into the details here, but if you want to hear the birth pangs of this change you can listen to some of the archives from The Sitter Downers‘ podcasts.

At this point my conclusions are as follows:

  1. If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption to be a sinful activity you should not do it.
  2. If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption to be allowed under certain conditions you are at liberty to consume them in a non-abusive manner.
  3. If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption to be allowed under certain conditions, but you are around those that do not consider it allowable you should not do it.
  4. Under most circumstances you should not try to convince someone that believes alcohol and tobacco consumption to be a sinful activity that they are wrong because by doing so you are in danger of committing (ironically) the very sin that one of your supporting texts (I Corinthians 8 ) warns against.
  5. If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption to be a sinful activity and those that disagree do not partake in your presence you should reciprocate by showing them large amounts of the grace for their terribly mistaken interpretation of Scripture, and be careful not to cause division among the Body over matters that are not essential.
  6. If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption are not prohibited by Scripture, but your Father and Mother do not share that view, it may be advisable to give up these freedoms in order to show respect to your parents in the spirit of the fifth commandment.

There may be further points that will develop with time, but for now that is what I have to offer. I will close with a letter written by Charles Spurgeon to the Daily Telegraph concerning some words he had spoken during a sermon he had co-presented some days before.

To the Editor of the Daily Telegraph.

Sir,

You cannot regret more than I do the occasion which produced the unpremeditated remarks to which you refer. I would, however, remind you that I am not responsible for the accuracy of newspaper reports, nor do I admit that they are a full and fair representation of what I said. I am described as rising with a twinkling eye, and this at once suggested that I spoke flippantly; but indeed, I did nothing of the kind. I was rather too much in earnest than too little.

I demur altogether and most positively to the statement that to smoke tobacco is in itself a sin. It may become so, as any other indifferent action may, but as an action it is no sin.

Together with hundreds of thousands of my fellow-Christians I have smoked, and, with them, I am under the condemnation of living in habitual sin, if certain accusers are to be believed. As I would not knowingly live even in the smallest violation of the law of God, and sin in the transgression of the law, I will not own to sin when I am not conscious of it.

There is growing up in society a Pharisaic system which adds to the commands of God the precepts of men; to that system I will not yield for an hour. The preservation of my liberty may bring upon me the upbraidings of many good men, and the sneers of the self-righteous; but I shall endure both with serenity so long as I feel clear in my conscience before God.

The expression “smoking to the glory of God” standing alone has an ill sound, and I do not justify it; but in the sense in which I employed it I still stand to it. No Christian should do anything in which he cannot glorify God; and this may be done, according to Scripture, in eating and drinking and the common actions of life.

When I have found intense pain relieved, a weary brain soothed, and calm, refreshing sleep obtained by a cigar, I have felt grateful to God, and have blessed His name; this is what I meant, and by no means did I use sacred words triflingly.

If through smoking I had wasted an hour of my time; if I had stinted my gifts to the poor; if I had rendered my mind less vigorous; I trust I should see my fault and turn from it; but he who charges me with these things shall have no answer but my forgiveness.

I am told that my open avowal will lessen my influence, and my reply is that if I have gained any influence through being thought different from what I am, I have no wish to retain it. I will do nothing upon the sly, and nothing about which I have a doubt.

I am most sorry that prominence has been given to what seems to me so small a matter; and the last thing in my thoughts would have been the mention of it from the pulpit; but I was placed in such a position that I must either by my silence plead guilty to living in sin, or else bring down upon my unfortunate self the fierce rebukes of the anti-tobacco advocates by speaking out honestly. I chose the latter; and although I am now the target for these worthy brethren, I would sooner endure their severest censures than sneakingly do what I could not justify, and earn immunity from their criticism by tamely submitting to be charged with sin in an action which my conscience allows.

Yours truly,
C. H. Spurgeon.
Nightingale Lane, Clapham, Sept. 23.

Note: Upon doing some research I have found that the several stories of Spurgeon giving up tobacco are apocryphal in nature.

10 Comments »

  1. # If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption to be allowed under certain conditions you should do it.

    what?

    i believe very moderate consumption is allowed. not because it makes any sense to me, but because the bible supports the position. (still dont know why a little wine is OK but a little mary jane is not)

    leaving that aside and just saying i believe it is allowed, doesnt mean i am compelled to use it.

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 4:41 am

  2. What I’m saying is that if you believe it is not a sin, then you are at liberty to consume alcohol and tobacco in an appropriate manner because there is no solid theological reason why you should not. I’m not saying you are obligated to do so.

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 8:56 am

  3. I thought that was a poorly worded point as well. It might have been better rendered as, perhaps:

    If you believe alcohol and tobacco consumption to be allowed under certain conditions you are free to do it.

    But figured that was what you meant.

    As for Adam’s perennial request for justifications on other substances, I think it is a poor argument. Pot is illegal in the US, by federal law. We are obligated to follow the law of a just government, as Romans 13:1-7 commands.

    Notwithstanding, if we assume for the sake of argument that the laws changed and pot becomes legal in the US, I think pot would fall under the same category as tobacco and alcohol.

    The same scripture would apply to pot as tabacco and alcohol. In all likelihood, f you are not mastered by it, you are not in sin (Aaron’s other point of causing others to stumble also apply too). The likelihood of being mastered by pot is pretty high, from what I’ve observed, so it may not be a smart past-time for people who are prone to addiction.

    Many pot advocates would rank the addictive properties of pot at the same level or lower than caffeine. How they determine this, I don’t know, but it is an interesting notion.

    Can one be mastered by a can of pop?

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 10:15 am

  4. By the way, was Hope You Didn’t Have Plans… the episode of The Sitter Downers where we can “here (sic) the birth pains of this change?”

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 10:24 am

  5. I have edited the offending point in the hopes of curtailing any further misunderstanding. Thanks for the comments Adam and Anthony.

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 10:42 am

  6. I’m not sure what episode(s) of The Sitter Downers are in question, but this may indeed be the one. Thanks for pointing out the typo as well!

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 10:48 am

  7. when referring to smoking pot, i am saying “if” pot was legal. i agree that in the current state of things disobeying the law would be a sin.

    i guess if one cant live without soda (caffiene) they can be ruled by it….it hard to envision such a scenario…i still draw a distinction between soda and other substances, the soda not altering my powers of reason. i drink enough soda that i guess its possible for me to perceive altered mental status as my normal functioning state. and im sure some people i have met in my life would back that up.

    as you guys will appreciate, i still am not intellectually satisfied with the state of things concerning alcohol etc..i expect that i (we) have taken it as far as it can go.

    unless of course the bibles prohibition on drunkeness has nothing to do with the lack of judgement that results from being drunk, but ive always assumed this was the case. maybe not.

    i try not to acknowledge previous episodes of the sitter downers in any way, shape or form….

    10-4

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 2:03 pm

  8. I would add that whatever reason you have for smoking a cigar, getting high is not one of them. The entire point of smoking cannabis is to experience the mind altering effects of the drug. You might then say, “tobacco also has mind altering effects”, and you would be correct. However, the effects do not create problems with normal social and personal functions such as are experienced by those that carry a one-hit bat on their key chain. In addition, cannabis is widely accepted as being a gateway drug by all but the most stubborn (read those whose brains are clogged with bong resin) individuals. For whatever reason our society has decided to delineate between cannabis and alcohol…perhaps because cannabis tastes like rotten flesh?

    Comment by — January 29, 2007 @ 6:17 pm

  9. Speaking of apocryphal, I think this piece was attributed to Spurgeon, but in fact was written more recently. It’s called “Feeding Sheep or Amusing Goats” and it’s not mentioned on any of the Spurgeon archives (like spurgeon.org), and I think someone just wanted to get their fundie paper noticed so they could rail against the “entertainment movement” they are so much against. After all, if church-goers don’t have a look on their face like they drank milk past the pull date then they might be having fun, and that’s a no-no.

    Comment by — February 2, 2007 @ 10:34 am

  10. All drugs are bad, period. Just think how nice the world would be with no smoking, drinking, caffine fixes, etc. Am I saying outlaw everything, of course not; but what I am saying is, if a drug is used for the specific purpose of trying to alter your state of mind and also may impact you or someone elses body or spirit in a negative way then it is most likely a sin. Of course we can’t be 100% sure of what God thinks but that’s my take on it. By the way, research has again shown that a drink or two a day reduces a man’s risk of heart disease.

    Comment by — February 11, 2007 @ 1:32 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .