<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dealing With Non-Christian Teaching&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.highcaliberguns.com/2008/05/04/dealing-with-non-christian-teaching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.highcaliberguns.com/2008/05/04/dealing-with-non-christian-teaching/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.highcaliberguns.com/2008/05/04/dealing-with-non-christian-teaching/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highcaliberguns.com/2008/05/04/dealing-with-non-christian-teaching/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>I guess a Christian philosophy mainly turns on the question of salvation.

But where it involves salvation, my understanding about what Paul was referring to is that traditional faith is the gospel.  With salvation in mind, a non-Christian philosophy is either anti-gospel or gospel-plus-something else, something I think C.S. Lewis called "hyphenated-christianity."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess a Christian philosophy mainly turns on the question of salvation.</p>
<p>But where it involves salvation, my understanding about what Paul was referring to is that traditional faith is the gospel.  With salvation in mind, a non-Christian philosophy is either anti-gospel or gospel-plus-something else, something I think C.S. Lewis called &#8220;hyphenated-christianity.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
